Anatomy of a self-financing study for HIV-AIDS skeptics
Background
The following theses have been put forward at various times by
HIV-AIDS skeptics:
- 1) An AIDS epidemic does not exist
- 2) HIV does not cause AIDS
- 3) 2 positive HIV antibody tests using different methods are not
correlated with ongoing HIV infection
- 4) AIDS is not lethal
- 5) HIV infection does not necessarily lead to any lethal disease
- 6) AIDS can be caused by use of strong (legal or illegal) drugs, AZT being
one of them
- 7) AIDS in promiscuous homosexuals is caused by rectal insemnation
- 8) AIDS in hemophiliacs is caused by foreign Factor VIII products
- 9) AIDS in Africa is caused by malnourishment
- 10) AIDS in transfusion recipients is caused by the underlying disease
- 11) AIDS in children of drug abusing mothers is caused by this very
drug abuse
- 12) AIDS can be caused by the strong belief that one suffers from a
lethal disease
Most of these can be found in the writings of Peter Duesberg or on the
Rethinking Aids Web site. For the mainstream
scientific evidence against these claims and for the causative role of
HIV for AIDS, compare the paper Relationship between HIV and AIDS by the
National Institutes of Health.
Here I want to propose a combination of scientific study and business
plan that has the following properties:
- The study will decide whether HIV infection leads to premature
death or not, even in the absence of all the factors described in
6)-12). The problems resulting from differing definitions of
AIDS are avoided.
- The business part of the proposal will generate money if HIV
infection does not lead to premature death; otherwise it will
loose money.
Proposal
A life insurance policy for the group of people who fulfill all of the
following criteria is offered.
- 2 positive HIV antibody tests using different methods
- not having taken in the past or currently taking any strong legal or
illegal drugs, including AZT and Factor VIII based products
- not malnourished
- no known severe diseases
- not engaging in receptive anal intercourse
- not born to a drug abusing mother
In addition, as a condition of the insurance policy, the policy holder
agrees to submit to regular thorough health examinations, the results
of which form the basis for the accompanying scientific
study. Furthermore, the policy holder forfeits all their rights
resulting from the policy should they start to take any strong legal
or illegal drugs at any time in the future without the consent of the
insurer.
To make sure that the results of the study be made public, it is
preferable that the to-be-created insurance company be a publicly
traded company and will hence have to issue regular business reports.
The end of the study can be defined as follows:
- bankruptcy of the insurance company, or
- success of the insurance company, as evidenced by rising stock
prices and adoption of similar policies by other life insurers.
Rationale
There are many people fitting the above criteria: HIV positive sex
partners of transfusion recipients or hemophiliacs or injecting drug
users, HIV positive children of (sex partners of) transfusion
recipients or hemophiliacs, HIV positive laboratory and health care
workers and their HIV positive children.
It can be assumed that these people are eager to buy the afore
mentioned policy (even for a higher than usual price) since they
cannot currently get any life insurance policy without lying (and
hence running the risk of forfeiting all policy benefits) and since
they have an interest in providing for their immediate family.
The very fact that the insurer believes that HIV does not cause lethal
disease and is even willing to bet on this belief should take care of
claim 12. Indeed, it can be argued that this proposal constitutes
the only possible study that cannot be attacked by claim 12 (short of not
disclosing the HIV status to patients, which clearly would be
unethical).
Should the medical establishment refuse to abandon the HIV-AIDS
hypothesis even in the event of a positive outcome of the study, then the
business part will at least have created a source of permanent income
which can be used to finance further investigations. In fact, the
profit of the insurance company will be higher in this case, since
competitors will presumably be reluctant to adopt similar policies.
Update 16-April-1997
The New York Times reported today that "Guarantee Trust Life
Insurance" from Illinois has started offering a life insurance policy
to otherwise healthy HIV positive people who acquired the virus
through sex or accidental needle sticks. They believe that the new
AIDS drugs available turn HIV into a treatable chronic disease. Drug
users are excluded from the policy because there is concern that they
won't take the AIDS drug cocktails.
Since HIV skeptics don't believe that protease inhibitors can be
effective against AIDS (sometimes they claim even that they are
dangerous and cause AIDS symptoms), I have to modify my above
challenge so that the insured persons will not be allowed to take AZT
or protease inhibitors.
Last changed:
16-Apr-97
Axel Boldt
<axel@uni-paderborn.de>